Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:55

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Milky Way has 50-50 chance of colliding with neighbor galaxy - NewsNation
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
PSG vs Inter: Opta Supercomputer Champions League Final Prediction - Opta Analyst
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Anthony Richardson sidelined by shoulder injury - NBC Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Stephen A. Smith Responds to Viral Solitaire Photo from NBA Finals Game 4 - Bleacher Report
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
If Trump were to lose in 2024, would that be the end of his grip on the Republican Party?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.